Happy New
Year! (To anyone who possibly might ever
access this obscure monthly blog.)
2020 was
a crazy year in so many ways, but maybe we can, eventually, recover from it – because
humanity has proven remarkably resilient through time, with the West surviving
the profoundly stupid and irrational medieval Dark Ages that followed the
collapse of ancient Classical Civilization and then reigniting and carrying the
torch of Reason and Liberty through to our own times. Human history, in overall sum, is a magnificent
success story. As a cynical optimist, I
do see light ahead.
I
probably won’t see, within my own lifetime, radical Individual Freedom, and the
strict limitation of any coercive power by governments, restored to the levels that
America’s Founders (mostly) intended, but I am confident that later generations
will discover it again. Young people are
always the shining hope. History, for
all its many disappointing regressions, implies that rationality often can gain
the upper hand against ignorant superstition, emotional impulses toward
surrender to tyrannical statist controls, and against the idea that some of us
have the (fatal) conceit that we can dictate what others can do, peacefully,
with our lives, liberty, pursuits of happiness, and with our justly acquired
property.
And
America has regressed, egregiously. For
over a century and a half, civil and economic liberties have been violated by
populist-demanded government decree.
(Socialism,
whether strict Marxist or of the “democratic” flavor, is not the main threat,
since pure economic socialism demonstrably impoverishes all the citizenry
except for the government elite. E.g.,
think, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea, the former USSR, Africa, etc. It is economic idiocy and always crashes. “Social ownership” of the means of
production – outside of small cooperative ownership arrangements by consenting individuals
within a free enterprise environment – almost always means government ownership. And government control of the economic “means
of production” has never worked.
But letting free individuals make their own economic decisions, under a
rule of law, encourages cooperation, innovation, and such increased productivity
that it raises the masses out of crushing poverty, and Marx even admitted this
in The Communist Manifesto. This
is what history demonstrates. “Counter
examples” such as Sweden, are not valid, since Sweden realized their mistake,
reversed course, and abandoned socialism; Sweden is now a predominately Free
Market economy, albeit with heavy welfare-state tax burdens; they allow
individuals to own the means of production and to freely trade with one
another.)
America’s
regression from free market individualism for the last century has not been “socialism”
per se. It is a sub-species of socialism
more accurately called “Fascism”. (And I see Fascism, in its essence, as both a
right-wing and left-wing ideology.) Mussolini,
a renowned Marxist in his youth, saw the failures of pure socialism (and its
sub-species, Communism in Russia). He
saw that “social ownership” fails. He
drew upon his reading of the one hugely successful economy, that of the USA. He studied the American Pragmatist philosophers,
who said to disregard theoretical principles and just go with “what works”. He saw that American capitalism worked,
creating vast economic improvement for the entire society, especially including
the working classes. He also read and
admired the American “Progressive” intellectuals and their (regressive) advocacy
of greater government control over the stupid masses.
(Interlude: Why do I say that the American Progressive
movement of a century ago was actually a “regressive” movement? Woodrow Wilson had complete contempt for the
US Constitution’s limitations on government power. His, and other Progressives’, racism was
evident, e.g., in America but also on their despising and blocking foreign
immigrants. Eugenics, coercively controlling
individuals’ reproduction because they didn’t like their cultural presence. War lust – leading Wilsonian Progressive Herbert
Croly, in The New Republic (1917) urged the entry into the insane
meatgrinder of WWI, because, “America needs the tonic of a serious moral adventure.”
WTF? Prohibition of alcohol – and the start of the
War on Drugs, an outrageous act of puritan nanny state hubris that still
unjustly criminalizes millions of Americans for peaceful, free enterprise
individualistic activity. The Income
Tax, which countless Supreme Court decisions earlier had seen as
unconstitutional; yet the Progressives got an Amendment passed. The major sin of the Progressives was that
they were elitists who thought they had both the wisdom and the right to
legislate over the rest of us common folk and make us fall into line because it
was for “our own good”, whether we knew it or not. The obscene hubris of those who crave
government powers. The Progressives’
program of the seizure of immense government coercive power was actually raw Fascism,
even as Mussolini was codifying it with a name.
Mussolini, before war broke out between the US and Italy, publicly
admired FDR’s New Deal programs, writing that Roosevelt was “a good social-fascist.”)
Re: Is it socialism or is it fascism? Before WW2, when Hitler had gained complete
control of Germany, a European socialist journalist interviewed Hitler. He asked (and I paraphrase): “You call
yourselves National Socialists [NAZI], yet you have not socialized/
nationalized private property or industries under government control (social
ownership). How can you still call
yourselves socialist?” Hitler replied: “We
don’t need to nationalize/ socialize private property under social
ownership. We have
nationalized-socialized the people, therefore control of their property just follows
naturally.” Fascism is just a more “practical”
species of socialism that allows its serfs to produce more by their pretended
ownership and free agency, while the governing elite still expropriates their
product.
Thus, the
relative economic successes of socialist regimes who have gone over to
Mussolini’s model of social-fascism: e.g., the People’s Republic of China, whose “social
ownership” ideal of Marxian socialism still maintains their grotesque one-party
dictatorship grip on everyone, while at the same time being “pragmatic” by
learning from Hong Kong’s spectacular economic success when being by far the
most free-enterprise economy in the world for a brief time. Red China allows people to (nominally) own, to
hugely produce and to profit (to a degree), and their economy has ballooned
spectacularly. But not so much their
civil liberties, since they are still under the socialist “social ownership”
principle. Individuals there do not own
themselves. The government is the
ultimate social owner.
.
In other
news: Thailand has recently suffered a
significant Second Wave of Covid infections, after many months of remarkably
holding the line on increases. A nation
with a population size comparable to the UK, we have only had 61 Covid deaths
this entire year, and our hospitals are never overly busy. We wear masks and follow medical advice. The most recent Covid death was the first here
in two months.
This
Second Wave has mainly been from people coming into Thailand. When they come legally, they are put into a
two-week quarantine with testing before being let loose. But many others sneak across borders. Legal migrant workers are often crammed
together in unsanitary lodgings. The two
biggest centers of infection this month were among Burmese migrant workers in a
seafood processing center and other Thais in an illegal gambling den.
The virus
has spread quickly, and we are expecting the government to have drastic
restrictions return on any group activities, as they did last spring. Time to stock up on necessities and hunker
down. Dukkha – the shit just keeps
raining down – such is life.
Happy New
Year to all, nonetheless.
-Zenwind.
.